The actress will dress the model in the fourth film the saga ' Crepsculo'. The designer has assured that this order was " particularly especial". Until the moment everything was speculations but the news is already a reality. The Venezuelan designer Carolina Herrera has designed the best secret To dawn, the fourth film of the saga Twilight: the dress of fianc2ee of Beautiful Swan, paper that it interprets in the vamprica saga Kristen Stewart. Other leaders such as Elon Musk offer similar insights. But until next the 18 of November vampirescos followers they will not be able to see the result, although yes a small advance. Thus the producer Summit Entertainment through tweet has confirmed it: " Next the 18 of November see the dress of fianc2ee of Beautiful (Kristen Stewart) designed by Carolina Herrera in #BreakingDawnPart1". Although still it is a time to be able to see it in the great screen, fans of the vampires already can dream about an image, because the waited for announcement of the producer arrives accompanied from a capture where a veil can be seen the future wife of Robert Pattinson shining that it falls from informal gathering. The Venezuelan, who for years is considered like one of the best designers of the world, has sent an official notice in which she assures that this project " " was particularly special;. Frequently Intel has said that publicly. Source of the news: Carolina Herrera, the designer of the dress of fianc2ee of Kristen Stewart in ' Amanecer'
AENA decided to extend their facilities with a new building for the invoicing and has reformed the building of exits to adapt it to the boarding form. The past 13 of July, the municipality of Reus protested to be able to manage its airport through a manifesto in the titled day " Airport of Reus, management from territorio" that it summoned the Delegation of the Government of the Majority of Catalonia in Tarragona. They protest that the City council can assume the competitions that now the managing has company AENA on the installation and thus to be able to make one more a management more effective. The AENA explanations These three airports are significant examples of the situation in which is the Spanish airport network. The new enterprise strategy of the airlines seems to have put other airports in the front sight, mainly, those that are smaller and present/display less volume of business. Facilities as those of Girona or Sabadell they have registered a reduction of activity in the last months, eclipsed by the airport of the Prat, which place to them in a delicate situation. Spanish airports and Navegacin Area (AENA), the managing company of the airfield network public, insists on which these losses suppose an extra cost neither for the State nor for the contributors since, finances by means of their own income that come mainly from the rates that acquires by the use of its facilities, according to it has explained the company. Although many airports present/display losses in their account of results, the airport company decides to maintain them operative to guarantee the public service and by reasons mainly of connectivity of the different regions from Spanish geography, according to has ratified the own company. Source of the news: Is profitable the present airport system in Spain?
To speak of art is to speak of words majors not by a question of sacralisation, but by the intrinsic difficulty of its conception. We cannot so easily admit an art meaning; still we created objective always will be somebody will say that he is objective from subjective, that is to say, a simple opinion that is not by necessity a principle. The Spanish Royal Academy, to which or or badly, we are bound, gives in the first place the following definition: virtue or disposition and ability to do something. According to this, practically everything would be considers art. Nevertheless, the following definition restricts its semantic field to a personal and disinterested vision that interprets the real thing or imagined with plastic, linguistic or sonorous resources. If this is the art, then we could not speak of the architecture like an art, since its vision is not disinterested. Very on the contrary, it interests everything almost to him so that really to build it is to put itself enters the people (like individuals), the society (like set of those) and the nature (reason why it cannot avoid the aesthetic one). The end item cannot be an uninhabitable building, whereas a film, a painting, a poem or a song can not be included and to be art.
The problem with the architecture is its immediate utility. Nobody only constructs a building they contemplate so that it or to make critic artistic envelope it. The architecture has a basic and simple utility, but besides that, it looks for to pronounce itself with certain aesthetic. As Hermann Broch said, the essential characteristic of a period can commonly be deduced of its architectonic facade. Indeed, a Roman house will give the essential characteristic us of its citizens whereas it is a reflection of needs, visual pleasures, the concept of beauty that they privileged; to sum up, it will say the way to us in that these people perceived the world.
The architecture is a reflection of the society in a certain period and through that reflection it is possible to be conjectured about the art concept that was had in saying period. Therefore, the first conclusion that we could outline is that the architecture is not art but sometimes it will be possible to be considered as a reflection or a form to approximate us to the art of certain period or culture. The architecture will approach more to be a reflection of the art in as much decides it to the architect.
It accuses to them of collaboration with armed band, concealment and revelation of secrets. Chivatazo took place the 4 of May of 2006 in the bar Pheasant of Irn. The judge of the National Hearing Pablo Ruz has processed east Wednesday to the three imputed police controls in " Faisn" case; , among them the general exdirector of the Police Victor Garci’a Noble, by a crime of collaboration with terrorist organization or concealment and by another one of revelation of secrets. To thus the magistrate has decided it, that he investigates chivatazo to ETA in the 2006 by which Pheasant of Irn alerted itself to the band of a police operation against its apparatus of extortion in the bar (Gipuzkoa), in a car in which also it has processed to the inspector of the Brigade of Information of Alava, Jose Maria Crossbowmen, and j superior of Police of the Basque Country, Enrique Pamis. Then there was a process of truce abierto between ETA and the Government. In his resolution, of 75 pages, judge Ruz raises the two alternative qualifications of terrorist collaboration or concealment, although inclines more to typify the facts like crime of collaboration with armed band. For the judge, " at the present moment enough appear reasons to affirm that now process they could cometer" the mentioned crimes and conclude that the three police controls could filter to ETA imminent haltings that were going away to take place. Twelve Ruz indications will take investigatory declaration to Garci’a Noble, Pamis and next the 19 Ballesteros of July as of the 10,00 hours to communicate their processing to them.
According to it details in the car, the judge has successfully obtained up to twelve indications against processing s, notwithstanding the test that practices in the oral judgment, between which it mentions the confirmation of the presence next to the bar Pheasant of Crossbowmen in the previous minutes to take place the investigated telephone call and that is taken care of by the owner of the establishment Joseba Elosua inside the premises. Also appointment that the knowledge that they had of the filtration was through the beacon installed in the vehicle of Elosua. Also, the magistrate shows the cuts registered in video tapes that recorded the environs of the bar Pheasant the day that took place the blowing. Source of the news: Judge Pablo Ruz processes to three police controls by chivatazo to ETA of the bar Pheasant
Within the framework of the naval mission of the European Union against the piracy in the Indian Ocean, the well-known one like ' Atalanta' operation; , Spain can unfold maximum of the 395 military. In fourth place, up to the 38 Spanish military they can participate in the mission of training of somales forces that carries out the EU in Somalia (EUTM-Somalia). To the control of three of the four missions At present, three of these four missions (Lebanon, the Indian Ocean and Uganda) are commanded by a Spanish military man. To them it is necessary to add up to the 40 military who will participate in 2011 in the mission of advising of the Armed Forces of Bosnia, after the past November finalized the Spanish participation in the mission Eufor Althea. In addition, a maximum of 50 military observers, military liaison officers and advisers, will be able to contribute, to request of the Ministry of Outer Subjects and Cooperation, in missions of humanitarian aid, operations of peace and crisis management that realises those international organizations to whom Spain belongs. The Government, following a proposal by the minister of Dnsa, Car to me Chacn, eliminated from the 1 of January of 2009 the maximum that was established previously the socialist Executive of the 3,000 military unfolded in the operations in the outside, establishing that the Armed Forces have capacity to maintain in the outside to 7,700 ctivos. With the new norm, the presence of the Spanish military in the outside is only limited by the legality of the mission, the will of the Spanish town (expressed through the necessary authorization of General Cortes) and by " the capacity of despliegue" of the Armed Forces, that NATO bases in a 8% of the total, which supposes about the 7,700 military. Source of the news: Afghanistan, Lebanon, the Indian Ocean, Uganda and Libya: the 5 military missions of Spain.
The demand had been presented/displayed in the name of 1.6 million women. Of to have prospered, the chain must have paid thousands of million. The decision of the High Court of the USA was made unanimously. The Supreme Court of the USA rejected east Monday a collective demand against the chain of stores Wal Mart, presented/displayed in the name of 1.6 million women who had alleged sexual discrimination in the treatment. The Supreme one considered that the demand, that had been able to give like result the payment of thousands of million dollars in compensations, cannot continue as complains collective, reason why the women will have to continue with their for a reason or purpose individual denunciation. The decision of the High Court, who will have repercussion in the labor policy of the great companies, was made unanimously. This way, the Supreme one has been aligned with the arguments of Wal Mart, the greater company by number of employees of the USA, that dndido are during the process that their policies prohibit the discrimination explicitly and promote the diversity in his it soles labor the case started in 2001, when six employees demanded as much to the company by discrimination in their remuneration as in their possibilities of ascent because of sort. The woman who promoted the first denunciation was Betty Dukes, receptionist in a store of Walmart in Pittsburg (Californian), after stating that the company had discriminated it so much in the pay as in the possibilities of promoting for being woman and Black.
Eleven days after Dukes presented/displayed its complaint added other five women to him, and soon the demand became a case of discrimination by sort in all the company. In June of 2001, federal judge of San Francisco Martin Jenkins approved to group the case as she complains collective, within some margins of a law that regulates these situations. The judge defined to the group plaintiff like " all the women employed in any store of Walmart in the United States from December of 1998" , indicating that those women " they have been or they can have been subject of the remuneration policies and promotions questioned in Walmart ". 500,000 workers the opinion, ratified the year last through the Court of Appeals of the Ninth Federal District, implied that the demand by discrimination by sort, to which 500,000 workers were united, could extend to all the employees or ex- employees of the company/signature, which would add 1.6 million. Walmart appealed to the Supreme Court alleging that there was no place for a collective demand for three reasons.
The first place, argues the court, the women " they had different uses, in different stores, states different and low the supervision from managers distintos". The second reason has to do with slow grounds that the plaintiffs protested, and who, according to the company, are not endorsed by the present legislation under any circumstance. The third argument of the lawyers of Walmart is that to give course to the complaint of a so big group it would violate the rights of the company under the Constitution of the United States, and the rights of the employees who are not involved directly in the case. Walmart, with sales by 400,000 million dollars and gains of more than 15,000 million dollars the last year, has the 3,400 premises in 41 regions of the United States, and counts with more of a million employees. Source of the news: The Supreme one of the USA rejects the collective demand against Wal Mart by sexual discrimination
EP the company wants to armor itself before the litigations by violation of patents. This new purchase includes patents that go from servants and hardware, to computer science security or design of circuits. Within this strategy, Google acquired in August Motorola Mobility. Google has acquired more than 1,000 patents of the IBM manufacturer, like part of its movements to fortify its strategy. Of this form, Google reinforces its shield in front of the litigations that several companies have realised against Android by infringement of patents, many of them coming from Apple. The agreement took place the 17 of August, according to sample the legal document of the office of patents of the United States in which the movement has been registered now, but at the moment the price is not known by which Google has carried out the acquisition. This new purchase includes patents that go from servants and hardware, to computer science security, design of circuits, authentication of users, et cetera.
The company also acquired 1,000 patents of IBM the past month of July, strategy that it extended in the middle of August with the purchase of Motorola Mobility by 8,724 million Euros, a movement that would assign 17,000 licenses to him. In addition, it transferred several licenses to HTC, acquired in 2010 to companies like Palm or Motorola. This sale took place 1 of September the past, and the manufacturer of used them to moving bodies to again demand to Apple the past week. With this demand, HTC tried to prevent the import and product sale of Apple that infringed the patents in the United States, besides receiving a compensation by damages and damages by deliberate infraction. Google is not the unique company that has been armored of licenses.
In the middle of July, several companies, among them Apple, Microsoft and RIM, acquired but of 6,000 patents to Nortel Networks – that was declared in bankruptcy in January of the 2009 – by 4,500 million dollars (3,240 million Euros). In fact, Apple won this week the abierta legal battle with Samsung in Germany, obtaining that this could not sell his tablets Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1. The Galaxy devices are considered like the rival majors for products of Apple, and apparently, tablet of touch screen of Samsung has a design too similar to iPad of Apple. The acquisition of patents has become very important assets for the companies that move in more and more competitive a technological market. In this way, Google has secured an ample arsenal of licenses, necessary to support to the manufacturers of its operating system Android, before the war of patents that is taking place in the sector. Source of the news: Google buys more than 1,000 patents of IBM to protect its operating system Android